?

Log in

No account? Create an account
July 2019   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
carole lombard 03

Fashion and furs from '34

Posted by vp19 on 2013.04.24 at 10:50
Current mood: contemplativecontemplative
The recent debate in Slate, the Huffington Post and elsewhere over a 1931 Photoplay article on who possessed the best figure in Hollywood (http://carole-and-co.livejournal.com/595236.html) is a reminder of how fluid public attitudes and tastes can be. Witness this Paramount portrait of Carole Lombard, p1202-1081, from 1934:

carole lombard p1202-1081a

By '34 standards, that's a pretty chic outfit, yet another reason Lombard was considered among the best-dressed stars of her era. Now imagine a current Carole at that age (25 or 26, meaning she would have been born in 1987 or '88). Can you imagine her, chock full of 2013 sensibilities, wearing fur (assuming her modern self was as much an animal lover as the 1930s Lombard was)? Somehow I can't, either. Take the fur out of the photo and the portrait is still pretty glamorous, if a bit dated.

This is an original photo, trimmed to 7" x 9 1/2". It's an original and up for bidding, with bids starting at $17.95. The auction closes at 11:57 p.m. (Eastern) on Friday. Think you're interested? Then visit http://www.ebay.com/itm/CAROLE-LOMBARD-Orig-1934-Fashion-Photo-Hat-and-Furs-/380628904732?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item589f402b1c.

Previous Entry  Next Entry