Log in

No account? Create an account
September 2019   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
carole lombard 01

CMBA Movies of 1939 Blogathon: "Made For Each Other"

Posted by vp19 on 2011.05.16 at 01:00
Current mood: artisticartistic

The biggest news Carole Lombard made in 1939 probably wasn't on the movie screen, but in real life, when after several years of waiting, she was finally able to wed Clark Gable. That isn't meant as a knock on her screen work that year, however. She made two movies in '39, both opposite leading men reaching filmdom's top tier. One was Cary Grant ("In Name Only"); this entry deals with her other co-star of '39, James Stewart, who teamed up with her for a drama with comedic overtones called "Made For Each Other." It would be part of a year's cinematic output that put him on the map for good.

As '39 began, Stewart was hardly unknown to the moviegoing public. He had appeared in "You Can't Take It With You," which would win the Academy Award winner for best picture of 1938, but it was an ensemble piece and he didn't have to carry the film. Other notable appearances had been in "Born To Dance" with Eleanor Powell, in which he introduced the Cole Porter standard "Easy To Love" (although Stewart would have been the first to admit he was no singer) and "Vivacious Lady" with Ginger Rogers. While Stewart was engaging, he had yet to fully assert himself on screen. Of "Born To Dance," Alistair Cooke wrote at the time, "There is James Stewart, trying to be ingenious and charming like Gary Cooper, but many tricks and light years behind."

In 1939, Stewart would go beyond a mere Cooper clone, and it all began with "Made For Each Other" (filmed in the fall of 1938, but not released until the following February), which Stewart, an MGM contract player, made on loanout to Selznick International. He plays a young attorney who falls for Lombard; they get married and have a baby. The film, directed by John Cromwell (who would also direct "In Name Only"), well conveys the highs and lows of domestic life -- although the final third of the movie, where their child's life is endangered by a disease that needs a rare vaccine, devolves into melodrama -- and James and Carole have a solid cinematic chemistry. (They would team up for several radio appearances over the next two years, and although each would perform "Made For Each Other" for "Lux Radio Theater," it would be opposite other actors -- Fred MacMurray with Lombard in 1940, Marsha Hunt with Stewart in 1945.)

"Made For Each Other" received warm reviews. Frank S. Nugent in the New York Times wrote, "It is a richly human picture they have created, human and therefore comic, sentimental and poignant by turns." (His paper would list it among its top ten films of the year.) John Alden in the Minneapolis Tribune -- who said he still preferred Lombard in comedic roles -- wrote, "Jimmy Stewart is becoming better and better, in our humble opinion, with every picture. His naturalness and freshness haven't been lost, and at the same time they haven't begun to pall on us."

But did MGM notice? The first film Stewart made for the studio in '39 was a lackluster vehicle called "Ice Follies Of 1939," in which we see him partnered in a ridiculous romantic triangle with Joan Crawford and Lew Ayres, featuring spectacle from the real-life Shipstad and Johnson ice troupe in Metro's attempt to cash in on the Sonja Henie ice craze. Fortunately, his next film at MGM was more substantial: a little comedy, directed by W.S. Van Dyke of "Thin Man" fame and co-starring Claudette Colbert, called "It's A Wonderful World." It's plenty of fun, and because its title is similar to that of Stewart's most famous film, it occasionally gets lost in the shuffle.

The eventual director of that other "Wonderful" film, Frank Capra (who'd worked with Stewart in "You Can't Take It With You"), brought James back to Columbia to star in one of the year's best-loved movies, "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington." This movie, co-starring Jean Arthur, is arguably where Stewart as all-too-human hero comes to the fore; his speech before the Senate ranks as one of the high points of his career. The New York Film Critics named him best actor of 1939 for this performance, beating out the likes of Gable, Robert Donat and others.

Another studio (Universal), another leading lady (Marlene Dietrich!), another genre (comic western), and a completely different Stewart for "Destry Rides Again," where James plays a sheriff who eschews violence a decade before making his series of acclaimed psychological westerns.

Not a bad way to close the year, arguably the best calendar year for an actor since William Powell in 1936 (although Powell's output that year never had anything as tawdry as "Ice Follies").

Stewart's 1940 would be nearly as good: "The Shop Around The Corner," directed by Ernst Lubitsch; "The Mortal Storm," a look at life in Nazi Germany; "No Time For Comedy," an adaptation of a play; and "The Philadelphia Story," for which he would win an Oscar as best actor. For a two-year stretch, Stewart's output would be difficult to beat. And following World War II, he returned as an actor of unique complexity, with a maturity and edge largely absent in his earlier roles. But Stewart's star began to shine for good in 1939...and it all started with "Made For Each Other."

This week's header shows Carole on the phone, kicking up her heels. (Maybe she's excited about this blogathon, too.)

For the list and links to the various entries, go to http://clamba.blogspot.com/2011/04/classic-movies-of-1939-blogathon-may-15.html.


(Anonymous) at 2011-05-16 15:17 (UTC) (Link)
I had forgotten that James Stewart had some many films released in 1939! MADE FOR EACH OTHER is not one of my favorite Stewart films. Actually, I prefer his grittier post-World War II performances. But it's always interesting to watch actors as they evolve throughout their career. Great job on this review, an ideal choice for the CMBA Blogathon.
(Anonymous) at 2011-05-16 18:20 (UTC) (Link)

Made for Each Other

Thanks for your wonderful post - I really love this movie, which is so beautifully acted by Lombard & Stewart - It's one of her best performances, really demonstrating her range.
- thanks again from Grand Old Movies
Via Margutta 51
viam51 at 2011-05-16 21:49 (UTC) (Link)
I don't really like this movie. I hate when they pair terrific performers in mediocre films. I mean, I just couldn't sympathize with them, they made a drama out the most trivial things (like why didn't they just put the cradle in the room and just stop arguing about it?), and then the movie stops being a comedy and becomes a drama...I just didn't get it. And Jimmy's character was so weak and whining...At least 1939 wasn't a bad year for Miss Lombard, she was excellent in "In Name Only":) Great post, I loved that you gave some background to their filmography around 1939 and the other films released that year.
(Anonymous) at 2011-05-16 23:19 (UTC) (Link)
I know how you adore Carole so I feel awful that you didn't have a better film to review.

I enjoyed all of your great photos and the interesting trivia. I hope you will have a look at my Ice Follies post tomorrow. Poor Jimmy, with so many great scripts that year, he certainly got the short end.
Nicely done,
(Anonymous) at 2011-05-17 06:01 (UTC) (Link)
This is a film I haven't seen in a while and that honestly didn't make much of an impression on me. But I like both Stewart and Lombard a great deal. They're two of my very favorites of the studio era. I found it interesting that you focused on Stewart and how this movie fit into his burgeoning career. He did have a busy two years and made some truly memorable films--"Mr. Smith," "Destry," "The Philadelphia Story," "The Shop Around the Corner," all of which are in my own top 10 James Stewart performances.

R. D. Finch
The Movie Projector
(Anonymous) at 2011-05-17 19:55 (UTC) (Link)

Great Chemistry

I loved Stewart and Lombard together in this film and wish they had made more movies with each other. -- Classicfilmboy
(Anonymous) at 2011-05-18 01:07 (UTC) (Link)

In Name Only

Hi Vincent -- ClassicBecky here! My gosh, you posted the most fantastic pictures, particularly newspaper articles and fan magazines! Very impressive...I just love Carole Lombard, and I am a very big James Stewart fan. I got to meet him and shake his hand when I was 14, and thought I'd keel over and die (you know how girls are at that age)! Carole was selling war bonds right here in my hometown of Indianapolis just before she was killed in the plane crash. Such a tragedy for everyone who knew her or loved her in the movies!

There are 2 movies that are similar -- In Name Only and Penny Serenade with Cary Grant and Irene Dunne. In Name Only was not the best of the two, but I thought Carole and Stewart were wonderful together, and I like the movie very much. Thanks for your article and your amazing photos! Very nice addition to our blogathon!
vp19 at 2011-05-18 02:45 (UTC) (Link)

Re: In Name Only

I am pretty certain you were referring to "Made For Each Other," rather than "In Name Only," when making comparisons to "Penny Serenade."

Thank you for the compliments!
(Anonymous) at 2011-05-19 04:39 (UTC) (Link)
I haven't seen this movie, but the pairing of Stewart and Lombard sounds interesting. I never realized how many films Stewart was in that year--it really was hit-and-miss for him, wasn't it?

I loved seeing all of the pictures accompanying this post--that final shot of Stewart and Dietrich is particularly striking! And I'm really loving the header.

Previous Entry  Next Entry